This is an excellent article by John Piper. Its a few years old, (2002) but in my opinion, even more pertinent today considering all that is going on in the Middle East. In the coming months and years, (if the Lord tarry) as we continue to observe even more visible manifestation’s of God’s hand in the issues arising in that part of the world, we as Followers of Christ are going to have to decide, hopefully according to the principles spelled out in God’s Word, how we are to view these things taking place.
To do so is going to take us having the mind and heart of Christ: Prayerfully seeking Him to gain an understanding in how He views these many issues, the people involved, and what His ultimate purpose is behind many of the actions taking place now, and those in the future as well. This is what I prayerfully attempt to do. One thing we can know from the Word itself–God wants all who will, to come to the saving knowledge of His Son Jesus.
“…Jesus stood and cried, saying, If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink” John 7:37
“But beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day; The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance” 2Peter 3:8-9
Prophecy will be fulfilled–that we know. Its only a matter of when and how. We cannot change it, nor can we postpone any fulfillment of prophecy–and, we cannot rush its fulfillment either. I like what Spurgeon wrote:
“Prophecy? One thing we can know for a certainty, man knows little, God knows it all!”
Got to love that man!
I find myself in agreement with John Piper’s words in this article.
How should bible-believing Christians align themselves in the Jewish-Palestinian conflict? There are biblical reasons for treating both sides with compassionate public justice in the same way that disputes should be settled between nations generally. In other words, the Bible does not teach us to be partial today to Israel or to the Palestinians because either has a special divine status. Israel has a unique place in God’s plans, but this status does not warrant a claim, at the present time, to divine prerogatives.
Israel was chosen by God from all the peoples of the world to be the focus of special blessing in the history of redemption which climaxed in Jesus Christ, the Messiah. “The Lord your God has chosen you to be a people for His treasured possession, out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth” (Deuteronomy 7:6).
Moreover, God promised to Israel the presently disputed land from the time of Abraham onward. “This is the land of which I swore to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, ‘I will give it to your offspring’” (Deuteronomy 34:4).
But neither of these biblical facts leads necessarily to the endorsement of present-day Israel as the rightful possessor of all the disputed land. Israel may have such a right. And she may not. But that decision is not based on divine privilege. Why?
First, a non-covenant-keeping people does not have a divine right to the present possession of the land of promise. Both the experience of divine blessing and the habitation of the land are conditional on Israel’s keeping the covenant God made with her. Thus God said to Israel, “If you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, you shall be My treasured possession among all peoples” (Exodus 19:5). Israel has no warrant to a present experience of divine privilege when she is not keeping covenant with God.
More than once Israel was denied the experience of her divine right to the land (not the final right itself) when she broke covenant with God. For example, when Israel languished in captivity in Babylon, Daniel prayed, “O Lord … we have sinned and done wrong…. To You, O Lord, belongs righteousness, but to us open shame … to all Israel … in all the lands to which You have driven them, because of the treachery that they have committed against You” (Daniel 9:4-7; see Psalm 78:54-61). Israel has no divine right to be in the land of promise when she is breaking the covenant of promise.
This does not mean that other nations have the right to molest her. She still has human rights among nations even in those seasons when she forfeits her divine right. Nations that gloated over her divine discipline were punished by God (Isaiah 10:5-13).
Secondly, Israel as a whole today rejects her Messiah, Jesus Christ, God’s Son. This is the ultimate act of covenant-breaking with God. God promised that to Israel “a Son is given; and the government shall be upon His shoulder, and His name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace” (Isaiah 9:6-7). But with tears this Prince of Peace looked out over Jerusalem and said, “Would that you … had known on this day the things that make for peace! … You did not know the time of your visitation” (Luke 19:42-44).
When the builders rejected the beautiful Cornerstone, Jesus said, “The kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruits” (Matthew 21:43). He explained, “Many will come from east and west and recline at table with Abraham … while the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the outer darkness” (Matthew 8:11-12).
God has saving purposes for ethnic Israel (Romans 11:25-26). But for now most of the people are at enmity with God in rejecting the gospel of Jesus their Messiah (Romans 11:28). God has expanded His saving work to embrace all peoples (including Palestinians) who will trust His Son and depend on His death and resurrection for salvation. “Is God the God of Jews only? Is He not the God of Gentiles also? … He will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith” (Romans 3:29-30).
The Christian plea in the Middle East to Palestinians and Jews is: “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved” (Acts 16:31). And until that great day when both Jewish and Gentile followers of King Jesus inherit the earth (not just the land), without lifting sword or gun, the rights of nations should be decided by the principles of compassionate and public justice, not claims to national divine right or status.