In recent days I’ve been doing more reading then writing/posting. Along with reading more in the word, I’ve also been reading news stories and items coming not only from the US Church (in general) but news stories which the Church is either concerned about or in some cases, up in arms over. Last weeks approval by the House of The Matthew Shepard Act, is one story.
quote..
A controversial hate crimes law moved a step closer to becoming law Thursday when the House approved the measure as part of a must-pass defense-spending bill. The legislation adds sexual orientation to the list of federally protected classes, and give states and local jurisdictions federal assistance to prosecute hate crimes.
The measure passed in the House as a stand-alone bill in April, but was attached to the $680 billion Defense Department authorization bill earlier this week. The Matthew Shepard Act, named after a gay college student murdered 11 years ago next week.
Several Christian leaders have decried the hate crimes law, saying it could criminalize preaching against homosexuality:
“This measure is about giving special rights based solely on sexual behavior,” said Family Research Council President Tony Perkins.
Some Christian pastors, including Dr. Joel C. Hunter of Northland – A Church Distributed in Florida, have endorsed the bill, especially after changes were made to bar prosecution based on the expression of racial, religious, political or other beliefs.
But many conservatives are not convinced of their free speech protection and say the legislation is unnecessary as gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people are already protected under existing state laws.
“This measure is about giving special rights based solely on sexual behavior,” said Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council. “All of our citizens deserve equal justice under the law. Do we somehow care less about victims violently assaulted in the act of robbery or during a personal dispute than we do about those assaulted because they belong in a federally designated, politically motivated category?”
“If someone under their ministry is charged with a hate crime against a homosexual, the minister himself could be accused of inciting that violence because of his teachings,” wrote Barrett Duke, vice president for Public Policy and Research for the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission.
His group is one of several, including Focus on the Family Action, the American Family Association and the Traditional Values Coalition, that have urged their supporters to contact federal lawmakers to express their opposition to the bill.
Other evangelical leaders say the hate crimes law is needed and that concerns about religious liberty infringements are overblown.
At a press conference in May, author Tony Campolo, founder of the Evangelical Association for the Promotion of Education, said evangelicals should want justice for homosexuals and transgendered persons. “Justice is love translated into social policy,” he said, “and this proposed law is designed to extend justice to Americans who often do not have avenues to obtain the same protection under the law that the rest of us enjoy.”
He said the bill does not infringe on ministers’ First Amendment rights. “There’s protection for those in the pulpit and for preachers to say what they want to say anywhere else, as long as it does not promote violence,” — (Sources: Hate Crimes Bill Moves Closer to Becoming Law and House Approves Hate Crimes Provision in Defense Bill)
If by chance you’ve not read the amendments, here is a link: TEXT OF AMENDMENTS, Page: S7491, DIVISION–MATTHEW SHEPARD HATE CRIMES PREVENTION ACT
One section in particular seems to point to the possibility those like Tony Perkins (interesting story on Perkins) and others who are sounding the alarm, may not have read the bill or even the amendments.
SEC. X10. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.
For purposes of construing this division and the amendments made by this division the following shall apply:
(1) RELEVANT EVIDENCE.–Courts may consider relevant evidence of speech, beliefs, or expressive conduct to the extent that such evidence is offered to prove an element of a charged offense or is otherwise admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence. Nothing in this division is intended to affect the existing rules of evidence.
(2) VIOLENT ACTS.–This division applies to violent acts motivated by actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability of a victim.
(3) CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS.–Nothing in this division shall be construed to prohibit any constitutionally protected speech, expressive conduct or activities (regardless of whether compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief), including the exercise of religion protected by the First Amendment and peaceful picketing or demonstration. The Constitution does not protect speech, conduct or activities consisting of planning for, conspiring to commit, or committing an act of violence.
(4) FREE EXPRESSION.–Nothing in this division shall be construed to allow prosecution based solely upon an individual’s expression of racial, religious, political, or other beliefs or solely upon an individual’s membership in a group advocating or espousing such beliefs.
Irregardless of how anyone feels about the bill, its going to be passed and signed. Next week actually, if things progress in the direction they are going now.
Is the passing of this bill going to affect you as a Christian? I’d be interested in hearing how you believe it will, if you wouldn’t mind sharing.
In the coming days and weeks you may see a few polls posted concerning the Church and some issues. I would greatly appreciate your input in these.