‘American Exceptionalism’

CBN News takes on the topic in the article ‘American Exceptionalism’ Next Political Hot Button?

Must say, over the last 8 years I have grown to hate the term. It now calls to mind an image of exaggerated self-importance, pride, and one who believes they “rightfully” deserve favor. Kinda reminds me of Lucifer.

quote…

Many Americans have not heard the expression “American exceptionalism,” but that could soon change. Political analysts say it’s likely to become one of the buzzwords of the 2012 presidential race.

The expression has already been a major talking point at CPAC-the Conservative Political Action Conference. It’s the focus for a chapter in former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin’s latest book…It was also the theme at this year’s Ronald Reagan Symposium at Regent University. Symposium speaker Dr. Daniel Dreisbach says interest in the issue makes sense. “I think this is an issue that goes to the core of who we are as a people, as a nation, our identity in the world, and the role we play in the world.” he told CBN News.

It’s not clear whether the faith community will embrace the idea in the next year. Many evangelicals do believe that America has a divine destiny as a nation — but not everyone. “It can become a kind of idolatry, raising up the nation to be the redeemer, the last best hope of mankind,” Heclo said. “Well, there are many faith voters who say there’s another best hope of mankind and it’s not a given nation.”

Full article can be read here

Pride goes before destruction, And a haughty spirit before a fall (Proverbs 16:18)

Hypocrisy

I’m not interested in Newt Gingrich’s numerous affairs/infidelities or the ugly facts surrounding his divorces, but for goodness sakes, either ‘own it’…all of it, or get out of the public spotlight.

Excuses, like he gave during the interview with CBN’s David Brody, frankly does one of two things: either it shows his own stupidity or it shows his belief in the stupidity of the public, especially as he now bills himself as a staunch defender of morality and family values,

Former House speaker Newt Gingrich gave an interview to the Christian Broadcasting Network to speak about his past indiscretions, the coming presidential race and what he calls the threat to “Judeo-Christian society.”

“There’s no question at times of my life, partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country, that I worked far too hard and things happened in my life that were not appropriate,” (link)

Today on “Fox News Sunday”,

asked about his adulterous past, Newt Gingrich said it was not hypocritical for him to impeach Bill Clinton while he cheated on his own wife because he never lied under oath….

The all-but-official candidate for the Republican presidential nomination granted that his own extramarital affairs will be an issue in the coming campaign, but he sounded hopeful that voters will, if they don’t forgive or forget, at least look the other way…

“Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace noted that Gingrich cheated on both his first and second wives. “I want to talk about your personal life,” Wallace said, broaching the issue in the larger context of whether Gingrich is disciplined enough to run for president. “I hate doing it, but you know it’s going to be an issue in the campaign and so I’m going to go there.” Wallace played the clip of Gingrich suggesting in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network earlier this month that his affair was “partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country.” “Speaker, you’ve had more than a decade to come up with an answer and, in all honesty, there are a lot of people who thought that answer was kind of lame,” Wallace told Gingrich…. (link)

 

 

David Barton and “Company”

Since first reading about the conference mentioned below I’ve wanted to post about it but frankly didn’t know where to begin. This type of stuff, which has become common-place in America today (and will no doubt only escalate before the next election) for me personally, is mind-numbing. One statement, made by potential Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee concerning David Barton, (Glenn Beck’s cohort and re-writer of history) left me speechless,

David Barton introduced Mike Huckabee at the Rediscover God In America conference, praising him as the epitome of the “Black Robe Regiment” mentality of seeking to apply the Bible to every aspect of the culture. Huckabee, in turn, repaid the compliments to Barton, calling him one of the most effective communicators in America and wishing that every American would be forced, at gunpoint, to listen to every Barton broadcast. (Huckabee: Americans Should Be Forced, At Gunpoint, To Learn From David Barton)

Anyway, Roger Oakland mailed out an Alert today which included links to a number of video clips. I want to share it…

Understand the Times:

THE DAVID BARTON SHOW COMES TO COSTA MESA

And thou, son of man, be not afraid of them, neither be afraid of their words, though briers and thorns with thee, and thou dost dwell among scorpions: be not afraid of their words, nor be dismayed at their looks, though they a rebellious house. And thou shalt speak my words unto them, whether they will hear, or whether they will forbear: for the most rebellious (Ezekiel 2: 6-7).

David Barton has become one of the poster boys for a number of well-known evangelical organizations who seem to have lost discernment. The reason this is important is that the church is being deceived. Also, this is part of the Roman Catholic Plan to establish the kingdom here on earth in the name of Jesus without Jesus as the head. Of course, the pope will be the head -instead.

In so doing, those who once believed the Bible and taught about apostasy have lost their way, lost sight of the gospel according to the scriptures and are now part of the problem rather than the solution. This is very sad, especially when the leaders of these of organizations have been warned. They did not listen. Worse yet, there is the Tony Blair-Rick Warren connection with Rome and the Peace Plan. While the PEACE Plan is being developed for the world, another Peace Plan is being developed for the Middle East that you can read about in the Bible. Further, a large percentage of what was once evangelical Christianity has now been sucked into Peter Drucker’s 666 plan.

Still few get it. When someone warns about this coming spiritual disaster they are looked upon as ignorant and out of touch with the good things God is doing through Brother Rick Warren and Brother Tony Blair. What people don’t know, is that this plan is put into place by those here on earth that are working for the god of this world and setting up the Last Days Delusion. When someone is in a delusion, they obviously don’t know it or they would not be in the delusion. Get ready! The Great Delusion is not here yet. More is coming. You have not seen anything yet.

The video clips below must be watched to protect yourself from the lie:

Huckabee suggests people should be forced to watch David Barton’s ideas

David Barton Sermon Index for whatever you need to take over America

Wall Builders – Building up or tearing down the Gospel of Jesus Christ or Building the kingdom without the King

Glenn Beck, Pat Robertson, Sarah Palin and David Barton, take over America – also supported by some Calvary Chapel pastors

Huckabee and Barton – Constitutional experts on American and the Founding fathers

Glenn Beck and David Barton and their plan

David Barton and his views from an observer

David Barton exposed by Chris Rhoda

David Barton meets Chris Rhoda

David Barton lies about Chris Rhoda

Will David Barton contribute to the possibility that Biblical Christianity could be outlawed from America as part of a plan that is a set up by the enemy?  Or is Barton and Company the enemy and many including themselves do not know it because they have lost discernment or maybe never ever had it…. Top Evangelical David Barton: “Why Don’t We Regulate Homosexuality?”

My opinion: Barton and the rest of the Take Back America/Dominionist crowd (both politicians and Christians) are laying the groundwork for what will be a loss of many of the freedoms the Church in America has taken for granted, and for the possiblity of ‘real’ (not just imagined) persecution. They have become enemies of the Cross.

Rick Joyner: “Get out of California..”

With the track record this guy has plus his unbiblical theology, I’d never make any decision based on a warning from him. What? are there no bible-believing followers of Christ living in California today? Wouldn’t you think the Spirit of God  would be telling them personally…

Oops, I forgot; God only speaks through or leads by today’s ‘Super Apostles’.

Joyner: America Is Under Judgment and God Is Going to Destroy California

*Related:

Rick Joyner: CHASING THE DELUSION OF POWER AND DOMINION

Apologetics Index, Rick Joyner and Morningstar Ministries

 

Quote of the Day

Posted by Michael at PhoenixPreacher under Things I Think,

Just when you thought the country was broke we found enough change under the couch cushions to go to war. There always seems to be room in the budget to kill people over there somewhere, never enough to help them live here. I find that odd.

The power of the new media to manipulate & evangelicalism’s fundamental authority problem

The title may be a mouthful, but does raise some interesting issues. If you are a follower of Christ and are reading this (an internet user) then these issues do and will continue to affect you.

Personally, I made the choice a couple years ago not to be swayed by the authoritative opinions made by others on the internet, no matter how well known (or respected) they are, but to do my own reading/research, pray, and depend on the Holy Spirit. Sometimes I end up agreeing with the person, other times I don’t.

In the age we now live, one in which this media called the (Christian) internet can exalt and promote, or on the other hand, literally destroy a ministry or teacher/preacher overnight, its necessary AND vital that we don’t automatically follow, like dumb sheep, the opinions of others: for just as the secular news media can (and most certainly does) manipulate how we view news events around the world, the Christian internet media (websites, blogs, etc.) can do the same.

Saying all that, InternetMonk’s Chaplain Mike makes some interesting observations using the subject of the latest internet brew’ha concerning Rob Bell’s book,

My Quick Take on the Bell Blow-Up (Subject: Rob Bell vs. Justin Taylor, John Piper, Kevin DeYoung, Al Mohler, et al.)

This post isn’t about Bell or his latest book, (I have never followed his teachings nor read any material written by him) but concerns not allowing ourselves to become “apathetic, spiritually lazy” believers who can be easily swayed in our opinions or manipulated by others: no matter how well meaning they may be.

Gingrich courts John Hagee

Interesting story…

When Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) accepted the endorsement of Texas megachurch pastor John Hagee in 2008, the result was a PR disaster.

But three years later, Hagee is once more involved in Republican presidential politics. Later this month, he’ll host former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a 2012 aspirant, at Cornerstone Church in San Antonio. For the candidate and the pastor, the summit is a chance for two controversial figures to help each other back into the spotlight—though a Hagee spokesman says the pastor has no plans to endorse Gingrich.

Gingrich Courts Incendiary Pastor Renounced by McCain in ’08

“Am I My Brother’s Keeper?”

Cain displayed a shameful tone of presumptuous impudence in his insulting reply to the Lord God. If it had not been on record in the page of inspiration, we might almost have doubted whether a man could speak so impudently when actually conscious that God himself was addressing him. Men blaspheme often in a most terrible fashion, but it is usually because they forget God, and ignore his presence; but Cain was conscious that God was speaking to him. He heard him say, “Where is your brother Abel?” and yet he dared, with the coldest impertinence, to reply to God, “I don’t know. Am I my brother’s keeper?” As much as to say— “Do you think that I have to keep watch over him as he watches over his sheep? Am I also a shepherd as he was, and am I to take as much care of him as he did of a crippled lamb?”

It is to be noted that MAN IS NOT HIS BROTHER’S KEEPER IN SOME SENSES.

There is some little truth in what Cain says. Generally some amount of truth clings to every lie; and even in the greatest possible profanity there is, usually, something or other of truth, though it is dangerously twisted and distorted. In this atrocious question of Cain there is some little measure of reason. In some senses no man is his brother’s keeper.

For instance, first, every man and woman must bear their own responsibility for their own acts before Almighty God.

It is not possible for a man or woman to shift from their own shoulders to those of another their obligations to the Most High. Obedience to the law of God must be personally rendered, or a person becomes guilty. No matter how holy their father was, or how righteous their mother was, they themselves will have to stand on their own feet and answer for themselves before the judgment-seat of God. Each person who hears the gospel is responsible for understanding it. No one else can believe the gospel for them, or repent for them, or be born again for them, or become a Christian for them. They must personally repent of sin, personally believe in Jesus Christ, personally be converted, and personally live to the service and glory of God.

Each man and woman must seek the Lord themselves—each one must lay their load of sin at the foot of the cross, and personally accept a personal Savior for themselves. You cannot do with the matters of your soul as you do with the business of your estate, and employ a priest in the same way as you engage a lawyer to represent you. There is only one substitute and advocate who can plead for us, thus no earthly sponsor can plead with heaven for us. God demands the heart, and with the heart men and women must believe unto righteousness, and with their own heart, too, for no one can take their place. Personal service is required by the great King, and must be rendered on pain of eternal damnation. No one can be his brother’s keeper in the sense of taking upon himself another man’s responsibilities.

Now, secondly, IN AN IMPORTANT SENSE WE ARE, EACH ONE OF US, OUR BROTHER’S KEEPER.

We ought to regard ourselves in that light, and it is a Cainish spirit which prompts us to think otherwise and to wrap ourselves up in hardheartedness and say, “It is no concern of mine how others fare. Am I my brother’s keeper?” Let us be far from that spirit.

For, first, common feelings of humanity should lead every Christian to feel an interest in the soul of every unsaved person.

I say, “common humanity,” for we use the word “humanity” to signify kindness. I trust among us the expression may be used that “common humanity” leads us to desire the salvation of others. I am sure, my dear friends, if you saw a man dying for lack of bread that you would wish to share your crust with him. Will you let souls perish for lack of the bread of life without pitying and helping them? If we saw a poor unfortunate person shivering in the winter’s cold we would be ready to divide our clothing that we might clothe him. Shall we see sinners without the robe of righteousness and not be anxious to speak to them of him who can clothe them in pure white linen? When a person’s life is in jeopardy because of an accident, we rush them anywhere and use every means available that we may rescue them; and yet this life is trivial compared with life eternal, and for us to be indifferent when men and women are perishing—indifferent to the dreadful anguish and torments which come upon unrepentant sinners throughout eternity, is to act as if all brotherly compassion had fled from our hearts.

Christians, I charge you, even with so low a motive as this, because you are men and women, and unbelieving men and women are your brothers and sisters, born of the same stock, and living beneath the canopy of the one eternal Father, therefore care for the souls of others and be, each one of you, his brother’s and sister’s keeper.

A second argument is drawn from the fact that all of us, especially those of us who are Christians, have the power to do good to others.

None of us have the same abilities, for none of us have the same gifts, or the same position, but like the little girl, a captive from Israel, that served Naaman’s wife, who had opportunity to tell of the prophet who could heal her master, therefore every young Christian here has some power to do good to others. We all have some capacity for doing good.

Now, take it as a truism that power to do good involves the duty of doing good. Wherever you are placed, if you can bless a person, you are obligated to do so. To have the power and not to use it is a sin. If you withhold your hand from that which you are able to do for the good of your fellowman then you have broken the law of love.

All your knowledge, all your experience, all that you possess that grace has given you, demands a return in the form of service rendered to others.

The Jews were God’s elect nation—elect to keep the revelations of God for all the nations; but they failed because they never cared about sharing those great truths with the Gentiles, but believed that they had received them for their own special benefit. The selfish spirit so grew on them that when God’s grace to the heathen was mentioned it made them angry with rage. And, you saved ones, you owe much to God, but do not think that you are saved for your own special benefit alone. It is a great benefit to you, but grace is bestowed on you like light, that you may give it to others who are in darkness; bestowed on you as the bread that was given by our Lord to his disciples, that they might share it among the multitude, that all might eat and be filled.

Think of this—that the power to do good involves the responsibility to do it wherever that power exists; and so, as far as you have any ability, you are by that very fact constituted as your brother’s keeper.

Another argument is very plainly drawn from our Lord’s version of the moral law. “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”

Now since we have loved ourselves so much that through God’s grace we have sought and found forgiveness of our sin, should we not love our neighbor so much as to desire for them to know their sin and to seek forgiveness too? It was right of us to secure our highest interests by laying hold of eternal life; but if we are to love our neighbor as ourselves, should we give ourselves any rest while multitudes are despising Christ and refusing salvation? No, my brothers and sisters, we have never come up to the standard yet; but in proportion as we do begin to love our neighbor as ourselves we shall certainly feel that God has made us in a measure to be our brother’s keeper.

A loveless religion is good for nothing. He who does not love his fellowman enough to desire their salvation, and aim at it with all his might, gives no proof that he loves God at all.

To the Christian perhaps the most forcible reason will be that the whole example of Jesus Christ, whom we call Master and Lord, lies in the direction of our being the keeper of our brother; for what was Jesus’ life but one of complete unselfishness?

What was said of Jesus at his death but that “he saved others: but he could not save himself”? The very fact that there is a Christ at all means that there was one who cared for others, and that our Lord became a man, means that he loved his enemies and came here to rescue those who rebelled against his authority. If we are selfish—if we make our own eternal life to be the one end of life, we are not Christians. We may call whom we please Master, but we are not following Jesus Christ.

Oh, though we gave our bodies to be burned, yet if we have no love for mankind it would profit us nothing. We may go a long way, and apparently all the way, in the externals of the Christian religion, but if the heart is never warm with a desire to benefit mankind, we are still aliens to the commonwealth of which Jesus is the great head. I am sure it is so. I do not speak my own mind, but the mind of Christ. If he were here what would he say to any one who called himself his disciple and yet never lifted his hand or moved his tongue to snatch the firebrand from the flame or save the sinner from the error of his ways?

It must be so, then: we must be our brothers’ keepers. Let the thought next rise in our minds that we are certainly ordained to the office of brother-keeper because we shall be called to account about it.

But, beloved, we must never end there, because brotherhood extends to all ranks, races, and conditions; ….Christians ought to love the erring and the sinful, and if we do not we shall be called to account for it.

If we have an opportunity of doing good, even to the vilest, and do not use it, we shall not be guiltless. Some of you who get rich in city then move out into the suburbs, and I cannot blame you. Why shouldn’t you? But if you leave the heart of the city, where the working people are, without any means of grace—if you are content to hear the gospel yourselves and withdraw your wealth from struggling among the poor, God will one day say to you, “Where is your brother Abel?”

City merchant, where are the poor men that enabled you to become wealthy? Where are they, who after all were the bone and sinew that made you rich, from whom you fled as though they were struck with the plague, and whom you left to die in utter ignorance? Oh, see to this, you rich men, you persons in responsible positions, lest the blood of the poor be demanded of your souls at the great day of accounting.

One thing more upon this calling to account;

The more needy, the more destitute people are, the greater is their claim upon us. For according to the account book—need I turn to the chapter? I think you remember it—they are the persons for whom we shall have mainly to give an account:

“I was an hungry, and you gave me no food; I was thirsty, and you gave me no drink; I was sick and in prison, and you did not visit me; naked, and you did not clothed me.”

These objects of charity were the most destitute and poor of all, and the great question at the last day is about what was done for them.

Such mercy as you show, such mercy shall you have.

(excerpts from  Am I My Brother’s Keeper? by C. H. SPURGEON)

Glenn Beck, New Age Theology and Mormonism

It’s still astounding to think of the number of Christian leaders, Pastors and Authors who have embraced Beck over the last two years, some (even) appearing on his TV program to discuss Bible prophecy!  One of the more recent being evangelical author Joel Rosenberg.

This statement by Rev. Richard Land (public policy director for the Southern Baptist Convention), referring to Beck speaking at his 2010 restoring honor rally, is down-right eerie,

“This guy’s on secular radio and television,” Land said Saturday, “but his shows sound like you’re listening to the Trinity Broadcasting Network, only it’s more orthodox and there’s no appeal for money…today he sounded like Billy Graham”

Glenn Beck is more orthodox?  Lord help us!

Anyway, this is an excellent video…

Brannon Howse:

300: Religious Right Forming It Own Spartan Army

Kyle, at RWW, has come across further information concerning the union forming between dominionist prophets and the religious right.

I must say the ‘joining at the hip’ of these two groups has been fascinating to watch unfold.

quote..

For months now, we have been chronicling how self-described prophets and apostles have been merging 7 Mountains/Dominionism with “mainstream” Religious Right activism … and increasingly the man at the center of this appears to be the Family Research Council’s Tony Perkins. Perkins was among the first to embrace Lou Engle and transform him into a Religious Right leader and now he seems to be doing the same with Rick Joyner of The Oak Initiative.

Just today we noted that Joyner, Jerry Boykin, and Janet Porter were gathering for a conference next month and as I was looking for more information about that, I stumbled across this video of Perkins, Joyner, Boykin and Frank Turek discussing the importance of Christians getting deeply involved in politics.

Perkins explains the absolute necessity of getting Christians into all levels of government while Boykin compared Christians today to the Spartan army and quoted King Leonidas by declaring molon labe” ["come and get them"] when he and his army were told to lay down their weapons. Likewise, Boykin declared “molon labe,” stating that he will not be silenced and challenged those in Washington who are out to take his liberties, rob his grandchildren, and destroy America to just try to take them from him.

Finally, Joyner announced that Christians have more than enough people to take control, but they need to bind together and, as such, would soon be unveiling (a) coalition called “300″

Assuming Room Temperature

Once in awhile some point I’ll read in a message will stick in my mind. The observation below, taken from a message by Don McGee, Laodicea, Assuming Room Temperature, is one which has stayed with me;

Years ago in a college class on forensic methods we studied the various techniques used to determine how long a human body has been dead. The methods are many and are often somewhat complicated, but one basic technique is to contrast the environmental temperature with the temperature of the deceased. The point is to see how close the body temperature of the deceased is to the ambient (room) temperature. A dead body, you see, will take on the temperature of its environment. Such was the case with the church at Laodicea….

I still find that fascinating information. Not only in how it’s applied to the Laodicean Church, but how it applies to a large part of the Church in America today. For it also has “assumed room temperature” as a result of having taken on the “temperature of its environment”.

That’s a frightening thought, for it signifies life is totally absent.

Just musing…

Texas Church Mourns Killing of Young Pastor

Tragic. Please remember this pastor’s family and congregation when you go to prayer.

Clint Dobson was remembered as a vibrant young pastor who always had joy in his heart during the vigil. “He always had a smile on his face and would hug you as you walked in,” said Lida Cummings, a church member, according to The Associated Press. “He loved everybody. He’s going to be greatly missed.”

Dobson, who was lead pastor of the satellite ministry of First Baptist Church Arlington, was found dead Thursday inside the church he had been leading for about three years. His ministry assistant survived but was severely beaten. Police suspect it was a robbery. Dr. Dennis R. Wiles, senior pastor of FBCA, expressed shock as they “try to come to grips with this unspeakable tragedy.”

More, Christian Post

And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it… (1 Corinthians 12:26)

A Simple Test for Distinguishing Heresy from Sound Doctrine

PyroManiacs: Your weekly dose of Spurgeon

It is a remarkable fact that all the heresies which have arisen in the Christian Church have had a decided tendency to dishonor God and to flatter man. They have always had for their covert, if not for their open aim, the exaltation of human nature, and the casting down of the sovereignty of divine grace.

Robbing God of the glory which is due unto his name, these false prophets would shed a counterfeit lustre upon the head of the rebellious and depraved creature. On the other hand, the doctrines of the gospel, commonly known as the doctrines of grace, are distinguished for this peculiarity above every other, namely, that they sink the creature very low, and present the Lord Jehovah before us as sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up.

So true is this, that the most uneducated Christian may, even if he is incapable of refuting an erroneous discourse, always be able to discover its untruthfulness, if it glorifies man at the expense of God. The merest babe in grace may carry this test with him: in the midst of the diversities of opinion with which he is surrounded, he may always judge, and judge infallibly too, of the truth or falsehood of a doctrine by testing it thus—

“Does it glorify God?” If it be so it is true.

“Does it exalt man?” Then it must be false.

On the other hand, does it lay man very low, and speak of him in terms which tend to make him feel his degradation? Then doubtless it is full of truth. And does it put the crown upon the head of God, and not upon the head of man’s free-will, or free-agency, or good works? Then assuredly it is a doctrine according to godliness for it is the very truth of the Lord our God.

From “Self-Sufficiency Slain,” a sermon preached on Sunday morning, 11 November 1860 at Exeter Hall.

Simple and to the point. I like it.

Westboro Baptist Church Promises To ‘Quadruple’ Protests After Supreme Court Ruling

Ah yes, the first amendment.

To bad the author’s of the amendment didn’t have the power to see into the future;  if they had, freedom of speech “might” have included (at least) a requirement or two.

quote…

A leader of the Westboro Baptist Church told reporters Wednesday that the congregation would “quadruple” the number of funeral protests in the wake of a ruling by the Supreme Court, which found that their controversial demonstrations were protected by the First Amendment, ABC News reports.

Margie J. Phelps, daughter of church leader Fred Phelps and legal counsel for the group, appeared defiant and emboldened by the high court’s decision during an interview Wednesday. “Let me tell you what this church does: Shut up all that talk about infliction of emotional distress,” she said, in response to the claim by Albert Snyder, father of slain marine Matthew Snyder, which had provided the impetus for the lawsuit. “When you’re standing there with your young child’s body bits and pieces in a coffin, you’ve been dealt some emotional distress by the Lord your God.”

The Westboro Baptist Church has repeatedly drawn controversy with its inflammatory picketing efforts, which often include bright signs displaying slogans such as “God Hates Fags” and “Thank God For Dead Soldiers.” The congregation most recently drew fire in January for announcing that it would demonstrate at the funerals of those killed in the Arizona shootings, though it eventually backed down on plans to protest at the service of the youngest victim, 9-year-old Christina Taylor Green.

Phelps on Wednesday defended Westboro’s practice as one that reflects their own religious beliefs, and not one that others should be allowed to view through their own “objective” standards.

“I very much appreciate the fact that I get to be the mouth of God in this matter,” she told reporters.

Link

(More like the ‘mouth’ of satan himself, in my opinion)

 

Pastor Ed Young and HBO

Personal note to Ed Young; Shut up and GO AWAY!

Ed Young, pastor of Fellowship Bible Church in Dallas, announced the other day that HBO will be showing up tomorrow night at his church to tape a segment for the network’s upcoming documentary about sex. For the occasion, the church has brought a bed on stage…

More with photo at: Jesus Needs New PR ‘Sex’ with Pastor Ed Young…’

The “new” definition of a Christian

Brannon Howse of Worldview Radio,

March 1st: CrossTalk,

Brannon gives details concerning a recent Glenn Beck program that he believes provides good evidence of a major shift taking place within evangelicalism. He noted how German Christians began to set aside their theology and doctrine and began to embrace the higher criticism of Julius Wellhausen who believed that human reason was above the Bible. Eventually they united under a bishop hand-picked by Adolph Hitler. Brannon believes that a similar movement is happening today as many evangelical Christians question the authority of Scripture via philosophies like theistic evolution, mysticism, gnosticism, post-modernism and uncritical tolerance. It’s within this questioning atmosphere that some evangelical Christian leaders are creating allegiances with individuals like Beck, who embrace an alternative worldview, in an effort to supposedly storm the gates of Hell.

In support of this premise, Brannon presented audio clips from Glenn Beck’s program that aired this past Friday, a program that featured Rabbi Daniel Lapin, Historian David Barton, James Robison, and former Vietnam Vet Dave Roever.

Direct link to audio

March 2nd:

The other day a well-known Christian author appeared on Glenn Beck’s TV program to proclaim that “born again” Christians get divorced, lie, use astrology, etc. etc., at higher rates than atheists. Yesterday Brannon explained why the admitted conduct of these “born again” Christians raises the Biblical issue of what it really means to be a Christian. Today, Brannon reveals that the poll being used by this Christian leader is 100% flawed and proves a large percentage of the “born again” respondents are not really born again Christians.

For example, the flawed poll by George Barna revealed in their own study that 34% of these “born again” Christians believe a good person can earn his salvation, 28% say Jesus committed sins while on earth, 15% believe that Jesus was not physically or bodily raised from the dead, 26% believe all roads lead to God, and 45% do not believe Satan is real.

If this is the new definition of a Christian, then no wonder so many of these Christian leaders say or act like Glenn Beck is a Christian since Beck also has stated he does not believe in hell, the exclusivity of Jesus Christ, original sin, or the resurrection of the Jesus of the Bible. Brannon also plays a very informative sound bite by John MacArthur talking about this flawed poll by George Barna.

Direct link to audio